Show newer
TastingTraffic Social®

THE OF IS 100% AGAINST AND AGAINST ITS OWN ??

the

EG: When they cannot do the RIGHT THING () Pass the Buck to the ?

The has been !

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing

Founder of
Founder of
Founder of

Disclaimer: DavidVTV.com and/or Davidv.TV

0
TastingTraffic Social®

DO WE REALLY NEED MORE ??

after of its first launch

Virgin Orbit stock fell in trading on Monday evening, after the company confirmed that its first launch out of the to reach

The company uses a modified 747 jet to send satellites into space, by releasing a rocket from under the aircraft’s wing mid-flight.

AKA !

cnbc.com/2023/01/09/virgin-orb

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

, AND !

WHY Is a !

.

, , , are LYING to YOU!

Alert! This is a COVERUP!

..moving stolen FUNDS | Cover up MAJOR LOSSES.

We have been Reverse Engineers (25 YEARS)

WE CHALLENGE , , to prove it.

HAVE :(

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

Is a !

1. is Totally . Limitations? Machine Learning !

2. IS . AI IS NOTHING MORE THAN A POWERFUL name and a !

Both and are !

They make the same ..

The term artificial intelligence has in or .

AKA ;)

youtu.be/xnKkHaALj1U

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

, AND !

AND AI IS !

in talks to invest $10 bln in owner -Semafor

MORE , AND COMING FROM THE SAME COMPANIES THAT ARE OF ??

OPENAI IS A . ITS A !

And the same criminals promoting it. INCLUDING MAINSTREAM MEDIA.

MORE BOGUS PROMOTIONS..

reuters.com/technology/microso

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

, CULTURE, HAS .

"He told investigators that Hall had told him about Powell’s “ –K,” and claimed she had performed a on him while the pair were the , the report said".

What ever happened to AND --not your --on duty NO LESS??

NOW RUNNING IN ALL NATIONWIDE!

nypost.com/2023/01/09/tennesse

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

History of Online since 1999.

Between 2000 - 2007 we were the largest traffic providers in North America -likely the world; but could not confirm at the time.

We Founded SEO and Invented -a .

End of 1999.

Our services of delivering traffic to our partners was always 💯% Traffic!

We were able to generate scalable Targeted and RELEVANT content to users from third-party MAJOR search engines (EG 10 INDEXED ).

SEO traffic is one of TO NONE FREE traffic sources available that could be tracked and confirmed fraud free;).

All of our traffic resolves from third-party Major Search Engines. (100% fraud free traffic)

We collected Real HUMAN IPv4 click referrals from major search engines displayed on the first page to confirm 100% Fraud free traffic before BIG tech big THEFT!

Important to note that at that time very few had fraud free traffic while fraudulent traffic was increasing exponentially.

Stock Markets in 2000: Prior to quarterly releases of earnings in stock markets, many would call to buy digital traffic, fraudulent or not.

Brokers (intermediaries) didn't care as long as they could show investor increased membership activity to site for investors approval (Fake growth number$) in order to release the next funding round.

Most brokers did not want real human traffic. Too expensive to bloat numbers. We only had 100% real IPv4 traffic to sell, to their disappointment.

Remember BUBBLE BURST in 2000?

Now you know why.

We invented RTB while acting as a DIRECT Publishers (Supply/Sell Side) to catch on the Advertiser/Brokers (Demand/Buy Side) in 2000.

We did not patent RTB technology and was also stolen in 2007; it has been renamed other acronyms.

However our RTB technology was combined with other programmatic technologies to commit online fraud by intermediaries.

In 2007 Google changed paths.

Our RTB technology was unstoppable for 7 years -they had to change directions. Google was built on FLAWED TECH to begin with.. AND THEN spearheading online fraud in worldwide ... OF ! W/ PROOF!

..And that was to serve Relevant Advertisements to user DIRECTLY NOT Relevant SEARCH Content.

A CRIME WITHIN ITSELF!

Like a Goto.com Overture.com 7Search.com etc. (eg. Dedicated PPC's (Pay per clicks).

In essence, Engines. FAKE RESULTS

Confirmed in Video below. Check it out!
youtu.be/vZBa5-wFAfQ
CONFIRMED! Goto: 4:00 min

Meanwhile third-party intermediates created very sophisticated bots of if's and elses' to tilt money production towards themselves (), in essence starting the ball rolling for .

Google at the same time when changing directions; also made sure IP's were not available (as it always has been) and that keyword referrers were eventually fully concealed.

Could not track where the traffic originated from?

100% BIG TECH WITH THE OF IN VIOLATIONS AND .

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

@ its ??

Bob Marley & The Wailers - Live at the Rainbow (Full Concert)

!

* !
*
*
*
*
*
*
* &

I Shot the sheriff but I did not kill the deputy.

Ever wonder what this song is about?

Let me put my detective black hat on.. does this sound more like the truth?? aka ?

aka The SHERIFF KILLED HIS OWN DEPUTY?? Next sheriff tries to kill the black man to make it look like the sheriff and deputy was in a shoot out with Black Man; Sheriff shoots deputy then tries to shoot black man; but the black MAN; IN , SHOOTs THE SHERIFF AND HIM.

who is left? a black man with a gun.

!

YOU BE THE JUDGE?

youtu.be/tebTvzehp2g?t=1483

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The is a EXPLAINED

The is the most on the nature of —the people make from and .

Unlike other finance books, this book does not assume stocks are ownership instruments.

It investigates the ownership assumption and asks, “Why are if the owners never receive money from the companies they own?”

Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from other investors.

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , never pay their investors. Their investors' profits are dependent on the inflow of money from new investors, which by definition, is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
Show older

INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS

8.92K

ADVERTISING

60

introduction

33

Broker_Arbitrage There is nothing here!

0

MASTERMIND_DIGITAL_MARKETING_LAB There is nothing here!

0

EMAIL_ALERTS There is nothing here!

0

Advertiser_DIRECT There is nothing here!

0

Publisher_DIRECT There is nothing here!

0
tastingtraffic.net

📛 DISCLAIMER: We Cover the 'Way' the #News is #COVERED_UP! 👿 JOBS FOR ALL WORLDWIDE COMING SOON! * Software Architect (PhD) Supervisor -25 years 100K PMS hours * EXPERT BLACK BOX TESTER * Founder of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) * Founder of RTB (Real Time Bidding) * Founder of HFT (High Frequency Trading) https://TastingTrafficSupportChat.as.me Book a Chat w/ TastingTraffic

Resources

Developers

What is Mastodon?

tastingtraffic.net

More…

v3.5.3 · Privacy policy