Show newer
TastingTraffic Social®

| !! THE !? !!

|

This is an additional section that was added to Chapter 6 in the September 2019 update for the book. It elucidates facts about stock buybacks.

1. Most buyback numbers are based on announcements not transactions.

2. The numbers don’t include "dilution" the additional shares sold to investors before or after the buyback.

3. I investigated 1,274 firms that engaged in buybacks between 2009 – 2016 and found 60% of them had increases in their shares outstanding between 2004 – 2018.

WE GOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRINTING MONEY LIKE PROSTITUTES NOW WE HAVE THE STOCK MARKETS DOING EXACTLY THE SAME WITH COMPANY BUY BACKS.

youtu.be/-XscM2GrKFU

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

| !! THE !? !!

|

This is an additional section that was added to Chapter 6 in the September 2019 update for the book. It elucidates facts about stock buybacks.

1. Most buyback numbers are based on announcements not transactions.

2. The numbers don’t include "dilution" the additional shares sold to investors before or after the buyback.

3. I investigated 1,274 firms that engaged in buybacks between 2009 – 2016 and found 60% of them had increases in their shares outstanding between 2004 – 2018.

WE GOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRINTING MONEY LIKE PROSTITUTES NOW WE HAVE THE STOCK MARKETS DOING EXACTLY THE SAME WITH COMPANY BUY BACKS.

youtu.be/-XscM2GrKFU

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

| !! THE !? !!

|

This is an additional section that was added to Chapter 6 in the September 2019 update for the book. It elucidates facts about stock buybacks.

1. Most buyback numbers are based on announcements not transactions.

2. The numbers don’t include "dilution" the additional shares sold to investors before or after the buyback.

3. I investigated 1,274 firms that engaged in buybacks between 2009 – 2016 and found 60% of them had increases in their shares outstanding between 2004 – 2018.

WE GOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRINTING MONEY LIKE PROSTITUTES NOW WE HAVE THE STOCK MARKETS DOING EXACTLY THE SAME WITH COMPANY BUY BACKS.

youtu.be/-XscM2GrKFU

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

| !! THE !? !!

|

This is an additional section that was added to Chapter 6 in the September 2019 update for the book. It elucidates facts about stock buybacks.

1. Most buyback numbers are based on announcements not transactions.

2. The numbers don’t include "dilution" the additional shares sold to investors before or after the buyback.

3. I investigated 1,274 firms that engaged in buybacks between 2009 – 2016 and found 60% of them had increases in their shares outstanding between 2004 – 2018.

WE GOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PRINTING MONEY LIKE PROSTITUTES NOW WE HAVE THE STOCK MARKETS DOING EXACTLY THE SAME WITH COMPANY BUY BACKS.

youtu.be/-XscM2GrKFU

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of —the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
TastingTraffic Social®

The Factor | The is a EXPLAINED.

NOTE: are returns/dividends because the firms just after the AKA

The Ponzi Factor is the most research on the nature of capital_gains—the money make from buying and selling stocks. Unlike other finance books, this book does not stocks are . It the and asks, “Why are stocks ownership instruments if the owners from the companies they ?” Most people don't that from buying and selling stocks come from .

When one investor buys low and sells high, another investor is also buying high and needs to sell for even higher.

Companies like , , their . Their are on the inflow of money from , which by , is how a works.

History shows that the association between stocks and ownership came through dividends—a profit-sharing agreement between the shareholders and the businesses they owned, which is also why all stocks paid dividends before the 1900s. The idea of non-dividend stocks is a new concept that came about over the past century. At some point, the academics and regulators decided it was okay for companies to issue stocks and avoid paying their investors indefinitely. But their acceptance of this new form of ownership—Ponzi assets—was through tradition (and possibly corruption), but not with any research or logic.

The sad truth is, people in finance do not study history and don’t know the difference between a value that comes from the exchange of money (a cerebral idea) and the money that is being exchanged (a possessable item). The product of this ignorance is a system and culture that treats Ponzi assets as ownership just because they’re printed by a company. It doesn’t matter if the company makes money, losses money, pays nothing, or prints as many shares as they want. If a company prints it, it’s ownership. This kind of shoddy logic doesn’t work in other industries, but it is the norm in finance.

youtu.be/kJOWwfOQ3Sc

PDF Here:
dropbox.com/s/kfqrt4r42cy3k3n/

TastingTraffic LLC

Founder of (Search Engine Optimization)
Founder of (Real Time Bidding)
Founder of (High Frequency Trading)

Disclaimer: tastingtraffic.net and/or JustBlameWayne.com (Decentralized SOCIAL Network) and/or its owners [tastingtraffic.com] are not affiliates of this provider or referenced image used. This is NOT an endorsement OR Sponsored (Paid) Promotion/Reshare.

0
Show older

INTERNATIONAL_TECH_NEWS

8.68K

ADVERTISING

58

introduction

33

Broker_Arbitrage There is nothing here!

0

MASTERMIND_DIGITAL_MARKETING_LAB There is nothing here!

0

EMAIL_ALERTS There is nothing here!

0

Advertiser_DIRECT There is nothing here!

0

Publisher_DIRECT There is nothing here!

0
tastingtraffic.net

📛 DISCLAIMER: We Cover the 'Way' the #News is #COVERED_UP! 👿 JOBS FOR ALL WORLDWIDE COMING SOON! * Software Architect (PhD) Supervisor -25 years 100K PMS hours * EXPERT BLACK BOX TESTER * Founder of SEO (Search Engine Optimization) * Founder of RTB (Real Time Bidding) * Founder of HFT (High Frequency Trading) https://TastingTrafficSupportChat.as.me Book a Chat w/ TastingTraffic

Resources

Developers

What is Mastodon?

tastingtraffic.net

More…

v3.5.3 · Privacy policy